Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.

Nancy Guthrie’s home boulevard just north of Tucson, Arizona, makes for a unique crime scene. There is no roadblock moderating access to the estate, nor any officials checking if the people outside are press, or anything else for that matter. Parking is handled ad hoc, on a first-come, first-served basis. The only visible law-enforcement presence is a police car rammed across the driveway, signaling the limits of encroachment, like an invisible wall in a video game.

The disappearance of Guthrie, a crime that remains uncracked after more than three weeks, is the rare story that spans the breadth of tabloid gossip and buttoned-up newspaper reporting. As such, the street where she lives has been completely paved over by media outposts. SUVs idle in the gravel shoulders, with camera cables snaking out of their doors and across the asphalt. Broadcast-news anchors, in full glam, take cover under listing canopies, patiently anticipating their next hit. Civilian gawkers amble up the road, snapping photos with the accumulating floral tributes. It is silent, save for the alien buzz of drones, holding perfectly still in their uncanny way, equipped with cameras tall enough to gaze over the police perimeter. It is also beautiful. Rust-colored mountains tower on the horizon, pale-green succulents defy the parched earth, Spanish-style shingles dominate the scenery.

A neighbor, walking her husky, turned the corner at the south end of the street late last week while I took in the scene. The dog used to make this part of the walk unleashed, but that has become impossible in the traffic. I asked her what it’s like to live among the chaos—all of these men and women, awaiting a resolution.

“I understand they have a job to do,” she said, gazing at the tent city, which, from here, seemed to meld toward a vanishing point. “But it is disconcerting.”

These are the facts, as best anyone can understand them: On Feb. 1, Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of longtime Today host Savannah Guthrie, vanished from her home. The case appears to be a kidnapping, as suggested by footage retrieved from the residence’s security camera, depicting—in pallid, soul-chilling night vision—a masked assailant at her door on the evening of the alleged abduction. That man, many assume, is responsible for the droplets of blood, belonging to Guthrie, left to dry on the outside wall.

Beyond that, the world gropes with innuendo. Several media outlets, most notably TMZ, received ransom notes demanding Bitcoin payments in exchange for Guthrie’s return, but none of those have proved to be authentic. Two miles from the crime scene, investigators found a pair of gloves that looked similar to those worn by the man in the footage, but the DNA sample retrieved failed to detect a match in the FBI’s database. A few people have been detained in conjunction with the investigation, but all of them were released without an arrest. FBI raids have fanned across the foothills, but none of them have borne fruit either. All told, 17 days have come and gone by the time I set foot in Arizona. The updates are growing scarcer. A chilly lull has settled in the valley.

It is hard to define why, exactly, Guthrie’s disappearance became the biggest story in America, but there are certainly some obvious factors. First and foremost, Savannah Guthrie is famous in this subliminal, monocultural way that is unique to celebrities who host network morning shows. Most audiences familiar with the Guthrie family are older and skew female, matching the demographic of those especially interested in true crime. The details of the case are sensationally macabre and rich with intrigue. I was not surprised to learn that several of my friends are in Guthrie-themed group chats; they’ve pelted me with their postulations all week long. Most crucially, the stalling momentum of the criminal probe has become its own kind of content engine, stimulating a growing belief that crucial puzzle pieces have yet to be properly interrogated, perhaps due to bumbling detective work.

“This isn’t just a missing-person case,” said Travis Harrison, a producer at NewsNation, which has pulled together an assortment of satellites and folding chairs in the prime real estate perpendicular to Guthrie’s address. “It’s a missing-person case that people think they can actually solve.”

And so the full magnitude of the true-crime apparatus has descended upon the zeitgeist and this sleepy street, with no end in sight. Anyone can assert their inquisitive expertise solely by making the trip and setting up shop. This has always been true of the television crews and roving journalists, leveraging every last angle they can find as the leads dry up. The New York Post is here. So is the Times of London. But also interspersed between the credentialed professionals is a gaggle of YouTubers, streamers, and TikTokkers—with mounted iPhones—documenting the saga in real time.

It was those influencers that I found most disquieting during my time in Tucson. Guthrie’s disappearance remained a mystery during my visit. But I did get to see firsthand how the true-crime cultural ecosystem metastasizes off the internet and into our chilling new reality.

“I feel like I’m on a crime vacation,” said John DePetro, a true-crime content creator and Rhode Island native, savoring the desert climate. He, alongside the other influencers, congregated toward the mouth of Guthrie’s driveway, establishing implied borders with the assembled journalists a few paces behind them.

DePetro launched into his origin story with me: He initially built a following on Facebook and TikTok by filming the unrest that followed the murder of George Floyd. (DePetro rode along with the police to their various dispatches. He thinks the gimmick found an audience due to the initial cancellation of Cops.) More recently, though, he has been escaping the Northeast to chase bigger fish, which is how he wound up in Tucson two weeks ago. Naturally, his engagement has skyrocketed since he started covering the Guthrie case. “Last week, I had 22,000 people watching me live,” he said. “I haven’t booked my return flight yet.”

DePetro’s oeuvre is pretty standard. His TikTok page billows with short-form clips from the crime scene—uploaded thrice daily from his front-facing camera—offering benign commentary on the languishing investigation. Ask DePetro why someone might prefer his content to the nightly news, and he’ll gesture toward the rapidly winnowing media industry. “Sometimes, when I cover a crime scene in Rhode Island, it’s just me and the local NBC and CBS affiliate,” he said. “You basically become the third television channel.” Unlike the ossified networks, DePetro is free to churn out content whenever he wants, for an audience keen to follow the investigation through 90-second updates. And despite the texture of the crime, he leans into the idea that there may be something nostalgic—perhaps even perversely comforting—about a vivid missing-person case, in all of its nightmarish splendor, breaking up the political anxiety of 2026. He might be on to something there. DePetro mentioned that he recently flipped on an episode of Hannity. Rather than leading with the usual adventures of Donald Trump, the host convened a salon, headlined by Nancy Grace, to talk about Guthrie.

DePetro isn’t especially scrupulous about what he allows on his social feeds. A few days ago, he posted a video with a woman who fashioned herself as a soothsayer. (She claimed to be overcome with a portentous feeling while crossing a bridge near the crime scene.) But DePetro may be one of the more virtuous characters here. Also present is Jonathan Lee Riches, a veteran troll and convicted scammer who—after finishing a prison term for wire fraud—has successfully rebranded as an investigative journalist. In his previous life, Riches was most famous for a bizarre incident in 2012 in which he impersonated the uncle of Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook shooter, at a memorial service in Newtown, Connecticut. (Unsurprisingly, Riches shrugged off my interview request.)

Riches’ livestream has proved exceptionally popular. His daily broadcasts last from sunrise to sundown, and they often eclipse a million cumulative viewers. Judging by the comments, Riches has managed to cultivate real credibility with his audience. (“I trust your channel over mainstream news, thank you for your hard work,” reads one comment, studded with a crimson heart emoji.) With the slowing trickle of new information, which has made the dedicated followers of the case increasingly restless, Riches is more than happy to make a meal out of insinuations. I watched as he scrutinized a photo of a law-enforcement officer unloading the letters from Guthrie’s mailbox, paying special attention to the fact that she wasn’t wearing gloves. The audience ate it up. “Sloppy AF!” someone wrote in the chat.

A few paces behind Riches, perched on a hill overlooking the Guthrie property, I bumped into Jimmy Williams, a 51-year-old former construction worker who, with the help of his fiancée, has switched careers to become a full-time true-crime YouTuber. His channel is entirely crowdfunded. Viewers chip in to pay for his airfare and lodging. By the time he arrived in Arizona, a care package was awaiting him at the local Walmart. (Among other things, it included the camping chair Williams is currently sitting in.) The structure of his stream is a bit more idiosyncratic compared to the others I encountered: Williams often holds polls in his live chat, determining what threads he should investigate next. That is why, tomorrow, he’ll be driving to an abandoned golf course a few miles away from the crime scene. Williams’ audience feels that Guthrie’s body might be stowed away there.

“It’s a really interactive thing,” he said. “I think it’s the new version of media. If you really want to be an independent journalist, now is the time to do it.”

The previous evening, Williams had featured in a segment produced by Inside Edition, a report that he characterized as a “hit piece.” The thesis of the segment concluded that the amateur sleuths amassing outside Guthrie’s home were doing more harm than good, due to the lackadaisical vetting they apply to the specious rumors—or outright fabrications—they issue from their feeds. (Like, for instance, the idea that a derelict golf course might be hiding a skeleton key.) I expected Williams to take umbrage at the idea that he was a font of misinformation, but surprisingly, he wasn’t exactly bothered by that charge. In fact, Williams actually conceded that false claims do pass through his stream, but he also argued that going down those rabbit holes is an integral element of true crime. Put more succinctly, Williams suggested that the misinformation is what makes the hobby worth participating in.

“I’m an alternative media person. I’m bringing the content to the people live. And there are going to be mistakes that are made, no doubt. There’s a lot of speculation flying around. I’m going to get things wrong, but a livestream gives you the time to correct those wrongs,” Williams said. “You can’t stop the speculation in true crime. It’s the nature of the beast. People are going to have their theories. It’s like taking a horse to water. You can lead them there, but you can’t force them to drink.”

Williams is perfectly correct in that assessment. It’s exactly why the Guthrie case has become big business for so many media entities, independent or otherwise. Everyone has a thesis, and all are in search of the venue to share it. These streamers happily play host to suppositions of all stripes, from all corners of the country, in a way that is native to networked communication.

As night fell on Tucson, a man in a reflector jacket parked his truck on the same hill where Williams was holding court and deployed a tripod. He had driven to Arizona from his native California after determining that no other streamer had taken the graveyard shift on the Guthrie beat, and he planned to stream the residence deep into the night. I was unsure what would provoke anyone to tune in, but like clockwork, the viewership ballooned to the thousands. The audience rehashed its hunches, circled potential suspects, stared at a static image of a horrific crime scene awash in twinkling moonlight. They didn’t leave until the crack of dawn.

Despite the media circus, there are moments when the streets surrounding Nancy Guthrie’s home do indeed resemble an ordinary neighborhood grappling with a tragedy. Small gestures of sympathy are everywhere, redolent of locals who are uncertain what to do but nonetheless feel as if they ought to do something. Yellow ribbons are tied around mailboxes and roadside library posts. Bouquets, pinned with note cards, are strewn here and there. Some passersby rubberneck. Others pause to say a silent prayer. A woman in a rhinestone shirt told me that she wanted to convene her fellow cyclists to whiz by the gulleys and alleyways around Tucson, searching for clues in the muck. Anything, she said, to help find Nancy.

Those glimpses of humanity had a way of rendering the mercenary atmosphere in the tent city incredibly disorienting—almost unreal. All told, no news broke while I was in Arizona. The most notable development in the Guthrie saga was the FBI upping its bounty for information pertaining to the investigation, a tactic I took as a tacit admission of desperation. This vast array of media professionals came no closer to uncovering what awful fate had befallen this poor 84-year-old woman. Instead, they foundered in the breeze, squeezing out whatever bitter juice was left in a dirge that would drag on for at least another week.

Maybe it is only ever lurid to cover the abduction of a human being. Maybe it is plainly shameful to sit idly by, waiting for the police to peel back more layers of abominable detail so it can be quickly disseminated to a hungry audience. Maybe the only purpose in any of this is to prolong morbid fascinations, to twist the knife. The content creators, to their credit, had no illusions about the ghoulishness of what they were doing here. Then there was me. Whatever my intentions, I had punched Nancy Guthrie’s address into Google Maps too. Highbrow or lowbrow, we had gathered here to serve humanity’s darkest impulses.

Three days after landing in Tucson, on Friday morning, I drove to the airport as another pop-culture bombshell finally threatened to knock Nancy Guthrie off the front page. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former Prince Andrew, had been arrested in connection with the Epstein files. I wondered how long the reporters would hold fast in Tucson before being plucked off the front lines to serve the fresher carnage in Buckingham Palace. Priorities shift, attention wanes. Soon, it seems, all that will be left of the Guthrie affair is a heartbroken family searching for answers that never did come. And that seldom makes for good content.